Do animals have a homeland? Ancient Greeks on the cultural identity of animals

Authors

  • Lucyna Kostuch

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9614

Abstract

The article aims to answer the following questions: How did the ancient Greeks associate animals with space, geography and their own settlements? Did they attribute nationality and territory to animals? Did they think animals missed their homelands? Could a foreign animalaccording to the Greeksexperience a process of cultural integration, namely Hellenization? The Greeks attributed regional identity to animals, defined by the local geography and by the history of a region enclosed by borders. At the same time, the world of animals seemed to be ethnically diversified, for the Hellenes coined the terms: “Hellenic animal”belonging to the Greek culture; and “barbaric animal”belonging to a foreign culture. According to the ancient Greeks, each animal had its homeland and customs, and could feel at home in some place on the globe. Additionally, there are some examples of non-native animals who experienced the process of “Hellenization.”

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lucyna Kostuch

Lucyna Kostuch graduated with a degree in History from Gdansk University, which awarded her a PhD in 2000. Since then, she has worked as a lecturer in the Department of Ancient History at Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Poland. Her main research interests are: ancient Greek warfare, ancient Greek religion; animals in ancient Greek culture; ancient Greek environmental history.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-22

How to Cite

Kostuch, L. (2017). Do animals have a homeland? Ancient Greeks on the cultural identity of animals. Humanimalia, 9(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9614

Issue

Section

Articles