Interspecies Political Scales and the Question of Legitimacy
A Response to “Scale Political”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.28265Keywords:
Animals, Politics, Scales, Legitimacy, Individual, Collective, SolidarityAbstract
Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka do us a great service in reminding us that when thinking about the relevant scales of our political relations with animals, it is crucial that we are not stymied by limiting ideas of unitary nation-states. We ought to embrace the very different and often overlapping political relations and affinities that humans share with animals. And these in turn invite thinking through what new forms of polity might facilitate human-animal flourishing. But in so doing, we must confront the first question of politics: how can these new forms of polity be rendered legitimate to the individuals subject to them? In this paper, I focus primarily on how such polities might be rendered legitimate to the human members who will be burdened by such new forms of community. This, I argue, invites consideration of the important interplay between the individual and collective scales of our political relations with animals, and the importance of cultivating solidaristic feelings of affiliation and sacrifice between members.
Downloads
References
Ahlhaus, Svenja and Peter Niesen, “What Is Animal Politics? Outline of a New Research Agenda.” Historical Social Research 40, no. 4 (2015), 7–31.
Carens, Joseph H. “The Egalitarian Ethos as a Social Mechanism.” In Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen’s Egalitarianism, edited by Alexander Kaufman, 50–78. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Cochrane, Alasdair. “Cosmozoopolis: The Case Against Group-Differentiated Rights.” Law, Ethics and Philosophy no. 1 (2013), 127–41.
Cochrane, Alasdair. Sentientist Politics: A Theory of Global Interspecies Justice. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Cochrane, Alasdair. Should Animals Have Political Rights? Polity, 2020.
Cochrane, Alasdair and Mara-Daria Cojocaru, eds. Solidarity with Animals: Promises, Pifalls and Potential. Oxford University Press, 2024.
Cochrane, Alasdair, Robert Garner, and Siobhan O’Sullivan, “Animal Ethics and the Political.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (2018): 261–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2016.1194583.
Cooke, Steve. “Imagined Utopias: Animal Rights and the Moral Imagination.” Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (2017): e1–e18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12136.
Donaldson, Sue and Will Kymlicka. “Scale Political: The Social Territorial Foundations of Animal Politics.” Humanimalia 16, no. 2 (2026): 27–43. http://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.28259.
Ekeli, Kristian Skagen. “Giving a Voice to Posterity: Deliberative Democracy and Representation of Future People.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18, no. 5 (2005), 429–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-7048-z.
Hinchcliffe, Christopher. “Animals and the Limits of Citizenship: Zoopolis and the Concept of Citizenship.” Journal of Political Philosophy 23, no. 3 (2015), 302–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12057.
Horta, Oscar. “Zoopolis, Intervention and the State of Nature.” Law, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2013), 113–25. https://raco.cat/index.php/LEAP/article/view/294784.
Kolers, Avery. A Moral Theory of Solidarity. Oxford University Press, 2016.
Kymlicka, Will. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford University Press, 2001.
Luke, Brian. “Justice, Caring, and Animal Liberation.” In The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, edited by Josephine Donovan and Carol J. Adams, 125–52. Columbia University Press, 2007.
Milligan, Tony. “The Political Turn in Animal Rights.” Politics and Animals 1 (2015), 6–15.
Pepper, Angie. “Political Agency in Humans and Other Animals.” Contemporary Political Theory 20 (2021), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00430-4.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Ulaş, Luke. “Global Community as a Response to the Cosmopolitan Solidarity Problem.” In Global Community? Transnational and Transdisciplinary Exchanges, edited by Henrik Enroth and Douglas Brommesson, 57–78. Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.
Wilde, Lawrence. “The Concept of Solidarity: Emerging from the Theoretical Shadows?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9, no. 1 (2007), 171–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00275.x.
Williams, Bernard. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, edited by Geoffrey Hawthorn. Princeton University Press, 2007.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alasdair Cochrane (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
