Applied Dog Genomics
Breed Analysis, Origin Stories, and the Puzzle of Mixedness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.19204Keywords:
breed, canine genomics, mixed-breed, genetic breed analysis tests, kinship, human-dog relationsAbstract
While the concept of interspecies kinship foregrounds partial connections across species difference, breed as a form of cultivated subspecies difference is also reckoned with as people seek to understand and care for their companion animals. This includes those whose companion animals are defined as mixed breed. This article explores the continued salience of breed as a way of knowing companion dogs in a context in which purity and pedigree is no longer the dominant framing of their value. It does so through a focus on companion dog cultures in the US and new forms of breed knowledge that are offered by genetic tests that provide a breakdown of the breeds in a mixed-breed dog’s background. In this applied science of canine genetics, the mixed-breed is made into a new resource for extracting profit, through the suggestion that people’s care for and relationships with their mixed-breed dog are enhanced by knowing their breed background. This promise depends, however, on eliding the complex and contested significance of breed for understanding dogs, both in canine behavioural science and among dog people. Investigating what lies behind the familiar question of “What breed is your dog?” through a focus on these tests suggests that interests in knowing the breeds in a mixed-breed dog reflect the continued cultural hold of modern breed imaginaries of fixing and mixing—the appeal of named and contained categories of dog diversity and fascination with the outcome of crossing—and with origin stories, not only for people, but also for dogs.
Downloads
References
Abel, Sarah, and Krystal S. Tsosie. “Family History and the Global Politics of DNA.” International Public History 2, no. 2 (2019): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1515/iph-2019-0015
Adams, Susan. “A Startup, Embark, Wants to Be a 23andMe for Dogs,” Forbes Magazine, 3 August 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestreptalks/2017/08/03/a-startup-embark-wants-to-be-a-23andme-for-dogs/
American Veterinary Medical Association. U.S. Pet Ownership and Demographics Sourcebook. Schaumburg, IL: AVMA, 2022.
Arizona State University News Release. “More than a Label: Shelter Dog Genotyping Reveals Inaccuracy of Breed Assignments,” EurekAlert!, 23 August 2018, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/887633
Bennett, Nikki, E., and Peter B. Gray. “A Study Evaluating Consumer Motivations, Perceptions, and Responses to Direct-to-Consumer Canine Genetic Test Results.” Animals 12, no. 23 (2022): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233360.
Bennett, Nikki E., Silvio Ernesto Mirabal Torres, and Peter B. Gray. “Exploratory Content Analysis of Direct-to-Consumer Pet Genomics: What Is Being Marketed and What Are Consumers Saying?” PLOS One 17, no. 1 (2022): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261694
Bennett, Nikki E., Suzanna Soto, Jhobany Nicolas-Serrano, and Peter B. Gray. “Dog Guardians and Genetic Testing: Survey Textbox Responses & Human-Animal Bond Influences.” Human–Animal Interactions 11, no. 1 (2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2023.0020.
Bir, Courtney, Nicole Olynk Widmar, and Candace Croney. “Exploring Social Desirability Bias in Perceptions of Dog Adoption: All’s Well That Ends Well? or Does the Method of Adoption Matter?” Animals 8, no. 9 (2018): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8090154.
Bir, Courtney, Nicole Olynk Widmar, and Candace Croney. “Stated Preferences for Dog Characteristics and Sources of Acquisition.” Animals 7, no. 8 (2017): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080059.
Bolender, Karin. “If Not for Her Spots: On the Art of Un/naming a New Ass Breed.” Humanimalia 10, no. 1 (2018): 133–56. https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9527.
Boyko, Adam R. “The Domestic Dog: Man’s Best Friend in the Genomic Era.” Genome Biology 12, no. 2 (2011): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-216.
Boyko, Ryan H., and Adam R. Boyko. “Dog Conservation and the Population Genetic Structure of Dogs.” In Free-Ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation, edited by Matthew E. Gompper, 185–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Bryce, Caleb M. “Dogs as Pets and Pests: Global Patterns of Canine Abundance, Activity, and Health.” Integrative and Comparative Biology 61, no. 1 (2021): 154–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icab046
Castillo, Michelle. “I Ran a DNA Test on My Dogs — Here’s What I Found Out.” CNBC, 27 January 2018. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/26/i-ran-a-dna-test-on-my-dogs--heres-what-i-found-out.html.
Collard, Rosemary-Claire, and Jessica Dempsey. “Life for Sale? The Politics of Lively Commodities.” Environment and Planning A 45, no. 11 (2013): 2682–99. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45692.
Conaboy, Kelly. The Particulars of Peter: Dance Lessons, DNA Tests, and Other Excuses to Hang with My Perfect Dog. New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2020.
Coppinger, Raymond, and Lorna Coppinger. What Is a Dog? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.
Dande, Innocent, and Swart, Sandra. “A City Gone to the Dogs? Power, Modernity and Canine Citizens in Post-Colonial Harare, c. 1980–2017.” Journal of Southern African Studies 47, no. 4 (2021): 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2021.1929442
Dande, Innocent. “The Political Economy of Informal Dog Breeding Businesses in Harare’s High-Density Suburbs, Zimbabwe, 1990–2019.” Critical African Studies, 13, no. 3 (2021), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2021.2005377.
Derry, Margaret. “Purity: Its Role in Livestock Breeding and Eugenics, 1880–1920.” Agricultural History 97, no. 4 (2023): 580–609. https://doi.org/10.1215/00021482-10795875
Franklin, Sarah. Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.
Ghirlanda, Stefano, Alberto Acerbi, and Harold Herzog. “Dog Movie Stars and Dog Breed Popularity: A Case Study in Media Influence on Choice.” PLoS One 9, no. 9 (2014): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106565.
Gillespie, Kathryn, and Victoria Lawson. “‘My Dog Is My Home’: Multispecies Care and Poverty Politics in Los Angeles, California and Austin, Texas.” Gender, Place & Culture 24, no. 6 (2017): 774–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339021.
Govindrajan, Radhika. Animal Intimacies: Interspecies Relatedness in India’s Central Himalayas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.
Grand View Research. Pet DNA Testing Market (2025–30). Summary report, 2025. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/pet-dna-testing-market-report.
Guest, Kristen, Monica Mattfeld, Margaret Derry, Donna Haraway, Donna Landry, Harriet Ritvo, and Sandra Swart. “Humanimalia Roundtable on Breed.” Humanimalia 10, no. 1 (2018): 5–26. https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9591.
Gunter, Lisa M., Rebecca T. Barber, and Clive D.L. Wynne. “A Canine Identity Crisis: Genetic Breed Heritage Testing of Shelter Dogs.” PloS One 13, no. 8 (2018): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202633.
Gunter, Lisa M., Rebecca T. Barber, and Clive D.L. Wynne. “What’s in a Name? Effect of Breed Perceptions & Labeling on Attractiveness, Adoptions & Length of Stay for Pit-Bull-Type Dogs.” PloS One 11, no. 3 (2016): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146857.
Haraway, Donna. J. Modest Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_Onco-Mouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge, 1997.
Haraway, Donna. J. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
Hart, Benjamin L., and Lynette Hart. “Breed and Gender Differences in Dog Behavior.” In Serpell, The Domestic Dog, 118–32.
Jervis, Lori L., Diane Warren, Emily Matt Salois, Scott Ketchum, Gloria Tallbull, and Paul Spicer. “Protectors, Aggressors, and Kinfolk: Dogs in a Tribal Community.” Anthrozoös, 31, no. 3 (2018): 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1455452.
Junttila, Saara, Anna Valros, Katariina Mäki, Heli Väätäjä, Elisa Reunanen, and Katriina Tiira. “Breed Differences in Social Cognition, Inhibitory Control, and Spatial Problem-Solving Ability in the Domestic Dog (Canis familiaris).” Scientific Reports 12, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26991-5.
Karlsson, Elinor K., and Kerstin Lindblad-Toh. “Leader of the Pack: Gene Mapping in Dogs and Other Model Organisms.” Nature Reviews Genetics 9, no. 9 (2008): 713–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2382.
Keil, Paul G. “Unmaking the Feral: The Shifting Relationship between Domestic-Wild Pigs and Settler Australians.” Environmental Humanities 15, no. 2 (2023): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-10422267.
Kharputly, Nadeen. “Whose Best Friend? Muslims, Dogs, and the Making of American Humanity.” Society & Animals 31, no. 1 (2020): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-BJA10016
Koster, Jeremy. “Most Dogs Are not Native Dogs.” Integrative and Comparative Biology 61, no. 1 (2021): 110–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icab016.
Kremer, Tom, and Sue M. Neal. “Where Do They Come from and Where Do They Go? Socioeconomic Patterns in Dog Acquisition and Rehoming.” Animals 14, no. 9 (2024): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14091378.
Leroux, Darryl. “‘We’ve Been Here for 2,000 Years’: White Settlers, Native American DNA and the Phenomenon of Indigenization.” Social Studies of Science 48, no. 1 (2018): 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717751863.
Lindblad-Toh, Kerstin, Claire M. Wade, Tarjei S. Mikkelsen, Elinor K Karlsson, David B Jaffe, Michael Kamal, Michele Clamp, et al. “Genome Sequence, Comparative Analysis and Haplotype Structure of the Domestic Dog.” Nature 438 (2005): 803–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04338.
Lord, Kathryn, Lorna Coppinger, and Raymond Coppinger. “Differences in the Behavior of Landraces and Breeds of Dogs.” In Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals, edited by Temple Grandin and Mark J. Deesing, 195–235. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2014.
McHugh, Susan. Dog. London: Reaktion Books, 2004.
Mehrkam, Lindsay R., and Clive D.L. Wynne. “Behavioral Differences among Breeds of Domestic Dogs (Canis Lupus Familiaris): Current Status of the Science.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 155 (2014): 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.03.005
Morrill, Kathleen, Jessica Hekman, Xue Li, Jesse McClure, Brittney Logan, Linda Goodman, Mingshi Gao, et al. “Ancestry-Inclusive Dog Genomics Challenges Popular Breed Stereotypes.” Science 376, no. 6592 (2022): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0639.
Moses, Lisa, Steve Niemi, and Elinor Karlsson. “Pet Genomics Medicine Runs Wild.” Nature 559, no. 7715 (2018): 470–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05771-0
Nash, Catherine. “Breed Wealth: Origins, Encounter Value and the International Love of a Breed.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45, no. 4 (2020): 849–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12383.
Nash, Catherine. Genetic Geographies: The Trouble with Ancestry . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015.
Nash, Catherine. “Kinship of Different Kinds: Horses and People in Iceland.” Humanimalia 12, no.1 (2020): 118–44. https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9426.
Nash, Catherine. “Valuing Difference: How Breed Matters for Animal Lives and Relations.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 7, no. 2 (2023): 702–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486231194840.
Nicolaou, Elena. “I Discovered My Rescue Dog Was a Rare Breed I Didn’t Know Existed.” Oprah Daily, 27 May 2021. https://www.oprahdaily.com/life/relationships-love/a36401636/embark-test-review-rare-breed-results/.
O’Brien, Sara Ashley. “Genetic Testing for Dogs Startup Gets Fresh Funds.” CBS News, 18 July 2017. https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/dog-dna-testing-startup-gets-funds/.
Ogden, Laura A. “The Beaver Diaspora: A Thought Experiment.” Environmental Humanities 10, no. 1 (2018): 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-4385471.
Ostrander, Elaine A, Robert K Wayne, Adam H Freedman, and Brian W Davis. “Demographic History, Selection and Functional Diversity of the Canine Genome.” Nature Reviews. Genetics 18, no. 12 (2017): 705–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.67.
“Ownership vs. Guardianship.” American Veterinary Medical Association. https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/animal-health-and-welfare/animal-welfare/ownership-vs-guardianship.
Padmabandu, Mimi. “Discover Your Dog’s Genetic Relatives with Embark’s Relative Finder”. Embark. Accessed 14 May 2024. https://embarkvet.com/resources/understanding-genetic-relatedness-in-dogs/.
Parker, Heidi G. “Genomic Analyses of Modern Dog Breeds.” Mammalian Genome 23, no. 1-2 (2012): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9387-6.
Quick, Tom. “The Making of a New Race in the Early Twentieth Century Imperial Imaginary.” The Historical Journal 63, no. 5 (2020): 1231–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X20000047.
Ray, Angela G., and Harold E. Gulley. “The Place of the Dog: AKC Breeds in American Culture.” Journal of Cultural Geography 16, no.1 (1996): 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873639609478348.
Reardon, Jenny. “The Democratic, Anti-Racist Genome? Technoscience at the Limits of Liberalism.” Science as Culture 21, no. 1 (2012): 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2011.565322
Rimbault, Maud, and Elaine A. Ostrander. “So Many Doggone Traits: Mapping Genetics of Multiple Phenotypes in the Domestic Dog.” Human Molecular Genetics 21, no. 1 (2012). https://doi.org.10.1093/hmg/dds323.
Ritvo, Harriet. “Possessing Mother Nature: Genetic Capital in Eighteenth-Century Britain.” In Early Modern Conceptions of Property, edited by John Brewer and Susan Staves, 413–26. London: Routledge, 1995.
Ritvo, Harriet. “Pride and Pedigree: The Evolution of the Victorian Dog Fancy.” Victorian Studies 29, no. 2 (1986): 227–53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3826951.
Ritvo, Harriet. “Species.” In Critical Terms for Animal Studies, edited by Lori Gruen, 383–94. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2018.
Romo, Lynsey K., Rachel Lloyd, and Zoe Grimaila. “An Examination of Communicative Negotiation of Non-Rescue Dog Stigma.” Society & Animals 30, no.1 (2019): 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341710.
Rosenberg, Gabriel N. “No Scrubs: Livestock Breeding, Eugenics, and the State in the Early Twentieth-Century United States.” Journal of American History 107, no. 2 (2020): 362–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaaa179.
Roth, Wendy D., and Biorn Ivemark. “Genetic Options: The Impact of Genetic Ancestry Testing on Consumers’ Racial and Ethnic Identities.” American Journal of Sociology 124, no. 1 (2018): 150–84. https://doi.org/10.1086/697487.
Serpell, James, ed. The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behavior and Interactions with People. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017
Serpell, James. “From Paragon to Pariah: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Attitudes to Dogs.” In Serpell, The Domestic Dog, 300–15.
Simpson, Robert John, Kathyrn Jo Simpson, and Ledy VanKavage. “Rethinking Dog Breed Identification in Veterinary Practice.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 241, no. 9 (2012): 1163–66. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.241.9.1163.
Svartberg, Kenth. “Breed-Typical Behavior in Dogs — Historical Remnants or Recent Constructs?” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96, no. 3-4 (2006): 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.014
TallBear, Kim. “Narratives of Race and Indigeneity in the Genographic Project.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 3 (2007): 412–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00164.x
Thompson, Deborah. Dog of the Decade: Breed Trends and What They Mean in America. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2021.
Turcsán, Borbála, Ádám Miklósi, and Enikö Kubinyi. “Owner Perceived Differences Between Mixed-Breed and Purebred Dogs.” PLoS ONE 12, no. 2 (2017): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172720
Udell, Monique A.R. “Challenging Stereotypes Improves Understanding of Canine Behavioral Genetics.” Learning & Behavior 50, no. 4 (2022): 441–42. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-022-00543-3
Van den Berg, Linda. “Genetics of Dog Behaviour.” In The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behavior and Interactions with People, edited by James Serpell, 69–92, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Vilà, C., and J.A. Leonard. “Origin of Dog Breed Diversity.” In The Behavioural Biology of Dogs, edited by Per Jensen, 38–58., Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CABI, 2007.
Weaver, Harlan. “‘Becoming in Kind’: Race, Class, Gender, and Nation in Cultures of Dog Rescue and Dogfighting.” American Quarterly 65, no. 3 (2013): 689–709. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43822925
Wells, Deborah L. “Factors Influencing the Expression of Behavior in the Domestic Dog.” In Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals, edited by Temple Grandin, 229–52, London: Academic Press, 2022.
White, Sam. “From Globalized Pig Breeds to Capitalist Pigs: A Study in Animal Cultures and Evolutionary History.” Environmental History 16, no. 1 (2011): 94–120.
Włodarczyk, Justyna. “Postmodern Breed: The Crisis of Breed as a Master Narrative of the Dog World.” In Animals and Their People:Connecting East and West in Cultural Animal Studies, edited by Anna Barcz and Dorota Łagodzka, 173–90. Leiden: Brill, 2018.
Woods, Rebecca. J. The Herds Shot Round the World: Native Breeds and the British Empire, 1800–1900. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2017.
Worboys, Michael, Julie-Marie Strange, and Neil Pemberton. The Invention of the Modern Dog: Breed and Blood in Victorian Britain. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.
Zelinger, Amir. “Race and Animal‐Breeding: A Hybridized Historiography.” History and Theory 58, no. 3 (2019): 360–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12122
Zhang, Sarah. “What Vets Think of ‘23andMe for Dogs.’” The Atlantic 12 November 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/vets-dog-dna-test/575152/
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Catherine Nash (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
