(In)tangible Teamwork
Human Perception of Nonhuman Sensing in the Case of Human-Sniffer Dog Ensembles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.18530Keywords:
sniffer dog ensembles, nonhuman sensing, interspecies sense-making, nonknowledge, animal agency, animal labour, human-animal relationalityAbstract
Sniffer-dog-teams are a vital, and at the same time highly contested, part of aviation security practices. Rooted in science and technology studies, cultural animal studies and sociology, the article explores the way nonhuman species, in this case sniffer dogs, appear within and against the logic of security ensembles at airports, both currently and in the aspiration for a fully-automated future. Based on the insights of non-participant observations, as well as interviews on more-than-human sensing practices in security contexts predominantly in Germany, the article explores how humans conceptualize nonhuman modes of sensation. While human dog handlers have to cope with the ambivalent requirements of their role working for the state, in which their nonhuman partner is classified as a supporting tool, they are confronted with the scepticism of the wider world concerning their reliability and capacity in odour detection. The sniffer dog handlers must therefore deal with nonknowledge, particularly when it comes to the question of how to ensure what their nonhuman partners smell. In conceptualizing their human-animal interaction as a performative dance of agency, nonknowledge can be characterized as the enactment of a productive force through the embodiment of sensual knowledge. In exploring the nexus of human perception and nonhuman sensitivity, the article contributes to the question of how the epistemology of knowing shapes interspecies sense-making in security related contexts.
Downloads
References
Ahto-Hakonen, Jenni and Hakonen, Aki. “All Fun and Games? Relationships Between Finnish Police Dogs and Their Handlers.” Society & Animals 31, no. 5–6, (2021): 726–43. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-bja10068
Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.
Blattner, Charlotte E. “Animal Labour: Toward a Prohibition of Forced Labour and a Right in Freely Choose One’s Work.” In Blattner et al., Animal Labour, 91–115.
Blattner, Charlotte E. “Should Animals Have a Right to Work? Promises and Pitfalls.” Animal Studies Journal, 9, no 1 (2020): 32–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/asj.v9i1.3
Blattner, Charlotte, E., Kendra Coulter, and Will Kymlicka, eds. Animal Labour: A New Frontier of Interspecies Justice? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Blattner, Charlotte E., Kendra Coulter, and Will Kymlicka. “Introduction: Animal Labour and the Quest for Interspecies Justice,” in Blattner et al., Animal Labour, 1–25.
Braidotti, Rosi. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity, 2019.
Charles, Nickie, Rebekah Fox, Harriet Smith, and Mara Miele. “‘Fulfilling Your Dog’s Potential’: Changing Dimensions of Power in Dog Training Cultures in the UK.” Animal Studies Journal 10, no. 2 (2021): 169–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/asj.v10i2.8
Cochrane, Alasdair. “Good Work for Animals.” In Blattner et al., Animal Labour, 48–64.
Coulter, Kendra. Animals, Work, and the Promise of Interspecies Solidarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
Coulter, Kendra. “Toward Humane Jobs and Work-Lives for Animals.” In Blattner et al., Animal Labour, 29–47.
DeGreeff, Lauryn E., and Craig A. Schultz, eds. Canines: The Original Biosensors. Singapore: Jenny Stanford, 2022.
D’Souza, Renée, Alice Hovorka, and Lee Niel. “Conservation Canines: Exploring Dog Roles, Circumstances, and Welfare Status.” In Blattner et al., Animal Labour, 65–88.
Fjellanger, Rune. “General Learning Principles for Training REST Dogs.” In Mine Detection Dogs: Training, Operations and Odour Detection, edited by Ian G. McLean, 11–22. Geneva: GICHD, 2003.
Fox, Rebekah, Nickie Charles, Harriet Smith, and Mara Miele. “‘Imagine You Are a Dog’: Embodied Learning in Multi-Species Research.” Cultural Geographies 30, no. 3 (2023): 429–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740221102907
Furton, Kenneth G., and David Winialski. “Comparing the Olfactory Capabilities of Dogs with Machines Designed to Detect Odors.” In DeGreeff and Schultz, Canines, 21–62.
Guest, Kristen, Monica Mattfeld, Margaret Derry, Donna Haraway, Donna Landry, Harriet Ritvo, and Sandra Swart. “Humanimalia Roundtable on Breed”. Humanimalia 10, no. 1 (2021): 5–26. https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9591
Haraway, Donna J. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2003.
Haraway, Donna J. When Species Meet, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
Hayward, Eva. “Sensational Jellyfish: Aquarium Affects and the Matter of Immersion.” Differences 23, no. 3 (2012): 161–96. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892925
Koski, Leena and Pia Bäcklund. “On the Fringe: The Positions of Dogs in Finnish Dog Training Culture.” Society & Animals 23, no. 1 (2015): 24–44. https://doi:10.1163/15685306-12341342
Meiches, Benjamin. “Non-Human Humanitarians.” Review of International Studies 1, no. 45 (2019): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210518000281
Mouret, Sébastien, Jocelyne Porcher, and Gaelle Mainix. “Military and Police Dogs.” In Animal Labor: A New Perspective on Human–Animal Relations, edited by Jocelyne Porcher and Jean Estebanez, 129–45. Bielefeld: transcript, 2019.
Neocleous, Mark. “The Smell of Power: A Contribution to the Critique of the Sniffer Dog.” In Body/State, edited by Angus Cameron, Jen Dickinson, and Nicola Smith, 199–208. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.
Peterson, Rolf O., Amy K. Jacobs, Thomas D. Drummer, L. David Mech, and Douglas W. Smith. “Leadership Behavior in Relation to Dominance and Reproductive Status in Gray Wolves, Canis lupus.” Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, no. 8 (2002): 1405–12. https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-124
Pickering, Andrew. “Material Culture and the Dance of Agency.” In The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, edited by Dan Hicks and Mary C. Beaudry, 191–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Porcher, Jocelyne, and Jean Estebanez. “Animal Labor: At the Forefront of Innovative Research.” In Animal Labor: A New Perspective on Human–Animal Relations, 11–33. Bielefeld: transcript, 2019.
Roepstorff, Andreas. “Thinking with Animals.” Sign System Studies 29, no. 1 (2001): 203–18.
Roepstorff, Andreas, and Nils Bubandt. “General Introduction: The Critique of Culture and the Plurality of Nature.” In Imagining Nature: Practices of Cosmology and Identity, edited by Andreas Roepstorff, Nils Bubandt, and Kalevi Kull, 9–30, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2003.
Sanders, Clinton R. “Mind, Self, and Human-Animal Joint Action.” Sociological Focus 40, no. 3, (2007): 320–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2007.10571313
Sanders, Clinton R. “‘The Dog You Deserve’: Ambivalence in the K-9 Officer/Patrol Dog Relationship.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35, no. 2 (2006): 148–72.
Sloterdijk, Peter. You Must Change Your Life: On Anthropotechnics. Translated by Wieland Hoban. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.
Tavory, Iddo, and Stefan Timmermans. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.
Warda, Tiamat. “Emotions at Work: Acknowledging Interspecies Emotional Labour of Guide Dog Mobility Instructors.” Society & Animals (2023): 1–19.
Warda, Tiamat. “Interspecies Emotion Management: The Importance of Distinguishing Between Emotion Work and Emotional Labour.” TRACE: Journal for Human–Animal Studies 8 (2022): 82–101. https://doi.org/10.23984/fjhas.111345
Waterbury, Ann, and Craig A. Schultz. “When Does Handler Perception Become Canine Detection? How Applied Behavior Analysis and Ethology Can Improve Handler Interpretation of Canine Behavior?” In DeGreeff and Schultz, Canines, 440–78.
Włodarczyk, Justyna. “Be More Dog: The Human–Canine Relationship in Contemporary Dog-Training Methodologies.” Performance Research 22, no. 2 (2017): 40–47.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bettina Paul (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
